Tag Archives: mega-church

Oh The Mega Church Part 2

megachurch

The following post is written by two people.  The first, is my fiance.  I love her a lot. The second is written by Aunt Susan. I love her a lot too.

Back at the start of this blog, I wrote a post called “Oh The Mega Church”.  As I re-read this post less than a year and a half later, I am slightly embarrassed.  I’ve wanted to remove it for quite some time, but the point of this blog is to journey together, and to see progress.  This includes the places I’m right and the places I’m wrong.  God has restored a lot of things in my life and part of that is my view of church, and even the mega church.  Through frequently listening to mega church leaders like Andy Stanley, Rob Bell, Francis Chan, Tim Keller, Craig Groeschel, Bill Hybels, Pete Wilson, etc. and seeing a lot of positive change come from these mega churches, my views are much different.  Most of my favorite thinkers and practioners in the church today…are at mega churches.

Is it the flavor of church for me? Nope. But that doesn’t mean I need to be a hater either.

Here is Sarah’s introduction to my aunt’s post: Read More »

The Manifestation of “Excellence” in Churches

joelosteenchurch

I’ve been reflecting a lot on the mega-churches.  Two of my family members are employed by a mega-church with many campuses all over suburbia Detroit.  My cousin, Ian, who is a video-making prodigy, does all kinds of amazing videos that inspire the 11,000 people that attend their different church campuses.  My aunt is on a team of people that writes curriculum for the kids at the church.  That is crazy that there is a team dedicated to just writing kids curriculum!

My cousin was telling me about the different levels of production for each service.  They have someone who is the dedicated “producer” of the service, then there are managers for each part of the service, then the people who actually make it happen.  Sounds like a rock concert, right?  Well of the 4 mega-churches I’ve been to, they have all felt like rock concerts.

And I’m not going to sit here and bash mega-churches for their rock star approach to their services.  Whatever.  They are reaching tons of new people, and although I think they are normally just feeding our desire for an entertaining Jesus, the relationship and true transformation of followers is much more difficult at these large institutions.

You may have heard last year that Bill Hybels, pastor of one of the nation’s biggest churches in Chicago, announced that after receiving market research on it’s congregation (which is crazy that a church is paying thousands of dollars for market research…), most people were not becoming devoted followers of Christ.  They had a huge revival and tried to revive their mission of “Turning irreligious people into fully devoted followers of Jesus Christ.”  I thought that this was great.

So what is making these mega-churches so successful?  They are doing things differently.  My cousin was saying how they create these incredible videos that are made to a click track that the band plays along with.  A click track is essentially a metronome that the band is listening to and is correlated for the entire “worship” time.  So much for spirit-lead worship!  And I am definitely no charismatic, but to have every little detail structured from the time people walk in the door until the time they leave just seems a little ridiculous to me.

And so Ian was telling me how hard it is to balance things at a mega-church.  On one hand, he is proud that the videos, music, and all other entertainment during the service is just as good as anyone is doing in the mainstream.  Heck, the church I went to in Pittsburgh was using an old camera from NASA spaceships!  But what happens when we have this “excellence” in churches?  It becomes a 55 minute Jesus-show rather than a time of coming together to serve and learn about Christ.lakewoodmegachurch

So how do these mega-churches respond to this criticism?  They rely entirely on small groups.  And they run these small groups very well.  They use solid content and use creative means.  I mean heck, if you can invest $73 million in a building that is the largest theater in the nation, you can find some people to make some good, freakin’ small groups.

So I’m sure it’s clear that I am unenthused at how these churches are spending their money.  Yes, that is true.  However, the practicality of how this ends up consuming so much time is what is crazy.  We will use the church my family is employed by as an example, which seems to be the same structure as most mega churches.  They use their Sunday mornings as “outreach”, mainly focusing on sharing the Gospel, but talking about different things too.  Wednesday is for your actual “going deeper” time – in depth Bible studies and actual songs that are directly to God, rather than a Linkin Park-type song you would hear on a Sunday morning (which I actually have no problem with considering who writes our normal praise songs).  If you have kids, they probably meet on a different night, and then you have your small group night.  That ends up being 4 gatherings at church per week, and that is if you are not volunteering for some other ministry!  That’s a heck of a lot of a time commitment.

But most people just come on Sunday morning to these places, get their fill for the week, and move on.  But what if instead of all those other nights in the week (which are all legitimate ministries), people were “doing” things for Christ.  For too long, the church has been focused on bringing people to it, rather than bringing it to others.  And I think most followers of Christ recognize this, but don’t know what to do with it.

Rather than giving your money towards a huge, new, and beautiful facility, what if you gave towards a greater need in the world?  What if rather than spending 4 nights a week at every gathering offered by the church, you actually made a weekly visit to the local homeless ministry or went every Wednesday night to a nursing home and developed relationships with the elderly?

I just hate to see us wasting time, and I know that I fall into this trap all the time.  I’ve been involved in every ministry that a church has to offer and I think that all have their place.  I suppose this is a call for us to be doing more with our hands and less with our comfortable, sit-in-a-chair-and-be-spoon-fed mentality that so often engulfs us.

Pictures courtesy: flickr – mlsnp

Oh The Mega Church

houstonlakewoodmegachurch

Ask someone who has been following Christ for a good amount of time and I’m sure they will have some opinion on the mega church.  Some believe it is fantastic, others might as well think that it is from the devil himself.  Let’s start with my history and move to looking at some positives and negatives of the mega-church movement.

I’ve grown up going to what I would call very large churches, but not mega-churches.  The size of the congregation (or people who call themselves members) was usually around 1,000.  These churches have a lot of the same characteristics of a mega-church (mega-churches have 2,000 or more on a given Sunday morning), but usually do not do their productions on quite as big of a scale.  I also went to a church in Pittsburgh for 2 years that would be considered a mega-church.  All of these institutions were doing some great things for God, no doubt in my mind.

However, if you have ever talked to me (or read my blogs), you probably recognize that just doing some good is not enough.  I believe that people like James Dobson and Jerry Falwell have done a lot of good, but have also left behind huge messes for us to clean up.  The same could be said of the sad Ted Haggard story, or even my story.  But I’m not talking about sin corrupting what we are doing, just misplacing our focus.megachurch

Take for instance this Christmas season.  I went to the largest mega-church in the area and watched their Christmas production.  And a production it was indeed.  I was sitting in theater-type seating watching these phenomenal musicians play Christmas and worship songs.  As in every mega-church I’ve been to, the whole room was black with cool lights shining on the stage.

But I couldn’t worship.  I kept waiting to see if Coldplay was going to come out and play “Viva La Vida”.  These lights that decorated the room had now turned into spotlight style lights shining on the congregation as we tried to worship to today’s trendiest worship songs.  Of course, there were videos galore and the pastor was young and hip.  He did the usual structure of using a visual aid and funny story to then transition into the serious message (I have no problem with this, it’s just very predictable).  And here was another thing.  Not only was a ridiculous amount of money spent on all of this “stuff” everywhere, the visual aids they used were crazy.  Now it wasn’t as far as Joel Osteen goes, in bringing a real-life elephant on stage (Really?), but the pastor used a front load washing machine that was the nicest machine I had ever seen.

So what?  Why does that matter?  It really doesn’t.  But what that represents is the larger picture.  These churches are reaching out to rich suburbia and playing into the entertainment-crazed culture we live in.  Rather than reaching out to the lowest of lows like Christ and trying to make them feel comfortable, the entire culture of these mega-churches of ridiculously priced [insert everything there] is poor stewardship.

But shouldn’t each church have its own target market?  Shouldn’t the rich people have a place to go too?  Yes!  And don’t get me wrong.  This church is giving away thousands of dollars to needy people all over the world.  I understand that it is hard to balance investing into your building here and giving to those in need.  And Christians are giving loads of money to these mega-churches and I think that is good too.  So my first question asks if these large institutions are honoring God with their money as best as they can?  They have obviously been blessed more than most churches and therefore have a greater responsibility.  I would say that less money should be spent on flashing lights into my eyes and video cameras and more should be spent on giving clean water to African communities.  However, if the church had not created a setting like that and the visual stimulus like they have, would they have had 8 packed out Christmas Eve services in a facility that seats around 2,500?  No they would not have.

So where does the problem lie?  With followers of Jesus Christ.  America’s Jesus is again too commercialized and entertaining.  The question I always ask myself when going to a new area and finding a new community of believers to get plugged in with is, “where would Jesus go to church if he lived in ______”.  I just always get this feeling that He would want it to just be simple.  He wouldn’t need 6-8 cameramen walking around filming all sorts of cool “rock” angles behind the words.  He would not need stagehands for a church service.  We would be able to tell a difference between a rock show and our local church.  Our entertainment and worship have become too intertwined and we must get back to a simple Jesus.